My Response to All of the Fred Thompson Supporters Who Left Comments on My Site


Frederick Paxson said on 12 Jan 2008 at 3:44 am:

FRED THOMPSON is the best person to lead this country. He is a true conservative and has been his entire life. All one has to do is check his record to see this.

MY RESPONSE: I did check his record. It’s on IMDB. He’s a TV actor, a doofus, and a buffoon.


Alan Srout said on 12 Jan 2008 at 3:54 am:

I think Fred can bring America back together, if that’s even possible. America needs a rebirth of patriotism and honor. Republicans also need a rebirth. President Reagan was our last rebirth and he can never be duplicated. Fred Thompson will bring his own down-to-earth common sense to this country.. A little of the good old days of faith, federalism and family would do well for this country. If a conservative runs as a conservative, he will win!
Think of it this way: Eight years of another Clinton White House? Now if that is not a sufficient enough reason to pull together as a nation, and fight this socialist liberal takeover of our government, what is? Folks, we are in for the fight of our lives, just as our young men and women are fighting for our freedoms in Iraq and Afghanistan, we must fight for our nation right here and now! I truly believe Fred Thompson is the one man who can pull this nation back together! Mike Huckabee, John McCain or Rudy Giuliani will just tear us apart.

MY RESPONSE: I think eight years of another Clinton White House would be great.


Jack Burton said on 12 Jan 2008 at 3:57 am:

Go Fred! The man is a genuine conservative, a leader, a statesman, well spoken, and cool headed. The candidate for grown ups.

MY RESPONSE: Fred Thompson is not the candidate for grown-ups. He is the candidate for fans of his television and film acting work who don’t realize that he’s running for President.


Joe said on 12 Jan 2008 at 3:58 am:

Since you want a national law banning smoking (like Huckabee) then you might be comfortable with a national law banning gay marriage! How about a national law banning idiot leftist bloggers who use their lipstick inappropriately….

MY RESPONSE: If gay marriage, or any kind of marriage for that matter, caused lung cancer I would be in favor of banning it. However, last time I checked, gay marriage does not cause lung cancer. And a “national law banning idiot leftist bloggers who use their lipstick innappropiately” sounds like a perfectly sound and reasonable suggestion. I have absolutely no idea what it means but I do feel that innappropriate lipstick use could be a real problem if it got out of hand so kudos for nipping it in the bud.


Regina Carter said on 12 Jan 2008 at 4:08 am:

“When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn’t a Jew.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.”
Sure, you applaud Huckabee going after the smokers! But what will stop him from goring your ox? Think!

MY RESPONSE: If Huckabee gores my ox then it will mean that I had an ox which at the present seems unlikely considering I swore after my last ox that I wouldn’t get another one. That said: never say never.


Samir said on 12 Jan 2008 at 4:19 am:

Fred Thompson is an old fuck stuck in the 1950’s.
Fuck him and corporate America.



American Man said on 12 Jan 2008 at 4:24 am:

Samir:What time is it there in Tehran? We don’t need your kind commenting on our elections. Go back to fucking your sheep and we’ll handle electing a leader for our country, okay?

MY RESPONSE: American Man – Do you have nothing better to do at 4:24 in the morning than be a a scary rascist on a random sketch comedians website? Can’t you be a scary rascist somewhere else?


John Lott said on 12 Jan 2008 at 4:49 am:
Senator Thompson didn’t make a statement about smoking being allowed. He just said that it wasn’t the role of the federal government to pass such laws. He would say pass the bans at the state level if that is what you want to do.

MY RESPONSE: “Pass the bans” sounds funny taken out of context. Sorta sounds like, “Pass the buns.” Heh heh.


  1. He is surging at a very good time for his campaign if he did it during the states that were already leaning towards other candidates it would be hard to maintain momentum… waiting until now in what amounts to his kind of stomping grounds for a big push might just be political genius.

  2. Millard "Witt" Romney

    Does “surging” mean Thompson has no chance and is running fourth or worse in most states? If so, then I agree with you, he’s surging. Surging like a hurricane, as the rock band The Scorpions might say.

    I thought he ran a much better campaign when he beat out Dianne Wiest for Manhattan District Attorney on “Law & Order”. Now that was a coup. He should reach back into that playbook.

  3. Frederick Paxson said

    I did check his record. It’s on IMDB. He’s a TV actor, a doofus, and a buffoon.

    Fred, it sounds like your describing yourself judging from the stupid remark you made

  4. Fred’s da’ MAN

  5. so i think there are people who go on the internet and google the name of a particular candidate and then go all comment crazy on any website that mentions that candidate. these people may or may not be paid for this stealth campaigning, i haven’t figured that part out yet.

    whatever you do, just don’t mention ron paul. then you’ll really be in for it.

  6. Fred’s not dead. I would like to see a McCain/Thompson ticket. I just want either one or both of them to go after Big Oil. We are all standing around while folks can’t make house payments, credit card payments, car payments and spending trillions on overseas peace.

  7. Megan's not dead either. Maybe you should vote for me.

    “Fred’s not dead”?!? Is this seriously the best slogan you can come up with?? Does anyone think these comments would actually convince a person to vote FOR Fred Thompson? It boggles the mind.

  8. I think you are dead wrong on the smoking issue.

    Maybe because I live in California, where we’ve had the smoking ban for 10 years or so already, I’m tired of this being an issue. It’s just like right-wingers and being “tough on crime.” No one likes crime, right? Of course smoking is bad for you, we all know that. But are you willing to go so far as to turn it into a criminal act?

    I live near Santa Monica, where they have recently banned smoking in OUTDOOR spaces. I can’t even smoke on my own balcony in my own apartment. This is stupid.

  9. In response to Michael’s blog: Wow people are idiots! But I do love it so…
    In response to Cameron: Wow you can’t smoke on your own balcony? THAT’S retarded. I’m severely sensitive to cigarette smoke, so I hate getting a whiff of it even in places where I’m expecting it…but that’s messed up. Poor smokers…should be allowed to ruin themselves on their own balconies! :( Seriously. P.S.- that last sentence wasn’t sarcastic; I really meant it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>